The last day for submitting the suggestions to the supreme Court for further deliberations.

Dear all, this the last day for submitting the suggestions to the supreme Court for further deliberations.

Please forward your suggestions to the following mail.ids today before 5:00 PM. 
the suggestions may include, the following, depending upon your opinion:

1.       Can the Supreme Court make constitution for the Country?

2.       Can the Supreme Court get the entire nation’s fed back within 8 days of it's order, and that too when the nation was under the grip of celebrations.

3.       Who will represent the people,w hose who do not have access to the internet, and does it mean that the less privileged are not to be heard at all? What about their freedom of speech and expression?

4.       Can a 5 Judge Bench of the supreme Court curtail the fundamental right of the citizens of their freedom of speech and expression, in contravention of the order of a larger bench of this Hon’ble Court in Keshavananada Bharati Vs. State of Kerala[1973, AIR(Suppl.) 1 ].

5.       How the Opinion seeking can be confined to the preselected tracks of 4 areas,without toughing any core issues? Is not placing unreasonable restrictions to the freedom of speech and  expression of the people to come forward with the practical alternatives to the proven failure of collegiums?  The people’s opinion has to be sought in comparison with the NJAC as well, which shall be improving the judges appointment system and not just improving collegiums system, which is an unconstitutional authority, a proven failure for last more than two decades, and the parameters restricting the opinion is the tricky effort to give sanctity of the popular support to the entire system, rather a dead system. It can only be an onld wine in a new bottle, without any material changes in the system.

6.       Why to experiment with the destiny of nation, with the failed system of collegiums? At whose interest the nation shall bear this failures? Why plating with the National interest, for the vested interest of a few and their progenies and promote nepotism?

7.       The suggestions should have been sought before the judgment, and not after the judgment.

8.       The failure to hear Adv.Mathews J.Nedumpara in all the stages exposes the bias of the Bench in it's own favour, where it tried all along to protect it's own powers, acting through their uncle advocate, being the father  of their brother judge, and writing a judgment in it's own favour is in violation of the very principles of natural justice.

9.       When hearing the public at large, all the issues shall be reconsidered and the proceedings shall amount to a review of the main judgment itself.

10.   What about the destiny of the undeserving judges already appointed by the collegiums, in open nepotism, and how long the nation shall bear those undeserving judges?There shall be a mechanism to identify and expunge those undeserving judges, in service as of date.

11.   There shall be a mechanism for curtailing the promotions of the present undeserving judges to the supreme Court or as the High Court Chief Justices.

12.   The Appointment of the judges and their promotions even to the Chief Justice of India shall be based upon their proven ability,  of the current portfolio as well and not based upon the blind seniority. The Nation do not have a liability to be burdened with the less able to it's service, when the able and outstanding talents are available, just for the sake of satisfying the personal ego of a selected few. The National interest is above their personal interest.

13.   There shall be declaration of vacancies, open invitation of applications, including to the vacancy of Chief Justice of India, and set procedures to deal with the said appointments.

14.    The appointment procedures shall be open to Right to Information Act,2005.

15.   The people are not the servants of the Judges, But the judges are in service to the Nation.

16.   The entire NJAC case shall be reviewed calling upon the public opinions.

17.   Adv. Mathews J.Nedumpara shall be heard.

……Adv.A.C.Philip

 

                   

 

NATIONAL LAWYERS' CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORM

President: Adv.Mathews J.Nedumpara:09820 535428(M)...02222 626432(o)

Office(Delhi Branch):#47,Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court Campus,New Delhi-1

E- Mail: nlcfjtar@gmail.com

As per website of justice department, the suggestions shall be forwarded to the following email addresses:

collegium-suggestions@gov.in

OR

collegium-improvement@gov.in