http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-video-recording-of-
court-proceedings-Supreme-Court/articleshow/45771221.cms
No video-recording of court proceedings:
Supreme Court
TNN | Jan 6, 2015, 06.45 AM IST
NEW DELHI: Like the US Supreme Court, the Indian Supreme Court
on Monday remained firm on keeping the courts a "no go zone' for
video cameras.
In February last year, a shaky two-minute video footage of the US
supreme court proceedings had gone viral evoking sharp comments
from critics. An advertisement put out by the 'Coalition for Court
Transparency' read - "The Supreme Court's decisions impact the
lives of Americans everywhere, but only a privileged few get to
witness history and see justice in action."
On Monday, Chief Justice HL Dattu-headed 3-judge bench thought
for a while when a petitioner argued for video-recording of court
proceedings. But it came out with an answer that stumped even the
petitioner, who was left speechless.
The bench said: "You want to put CCTV in the court? Right now
what ever we discuss in the innermost chamber is out there in the
public. What we discuss among judges in the Collegium meetings
are also out in public. There is no need for CCTV."
court-proceedings-Supreme-Court/articleshow/45771221.cms
No video-recording of court proceedings:
Supreme Court
TNN | Jan 6, 2015, 06.45 AM IST
NEW DELHI: Like the US Supreme Court, the Indian Supreme Court
on Monday remained firm on keeping the courts a "no go zone' for
video cameras.
In February last year, a shaky two-minute video footage of the US
supreme court proceedings had gone viral evoking sharp comments
from critics. An advertisement put out by the 'Coalition for Court
Transparency' read - "The Supreme Court's decisions impact the
lives of Americans everywhere, but only a privileged few get to
witness history and see justice in action."
On Monday, Chief Justice HL Dattu-headed 3-judge bench thought
for a while when a petitioner argued for video-recording of court
proceedings. But it came out with an answer that stumped even the
petitioner, who was left speechless.
The bench said: "You want to put CCTV in the court? Right now
what ever we discuss in the innermost chamber is out there in the
public. What we discuss among judges in the Collegium meetings
are also out in public. There is no need for CCTV."
No comments:
Post a Comment